February, 2012
バックナンバー
- May, 2012
- April, 2012
- March, 2012
- February, 2012
- January, 2012
- December, 2011
- November, 2011
- October, 2011
- September, 2011
- August, 2011
- July, 2011
- June, 2011
- May, 2011
- April, 2011
- March, 2011
- February, 2011
- January, 2011
- December, 2010
- November, 2010
- October, 2010
- September, 2010
- August, 2010
- July, 2010
- June, 2010
- May, 2010
- April, 2010
- March, 2010
- February, 2010
- January, 2010
- December, 2009
- November, 2009
- October, 2009
- September, 2009
- August, 2009
- July, 2009
- June, 2009
- May, 2009
- April, 2009
- March, 2009
- February, 2009
- January, 2009
- December, 2008
- November, 2008
- October, 2008
- September, 2008
- August, 2008
- July, 2008
- June, 2008
- May, 2008
- April, 2008
- March, 2008
- February, 2008
- January, 2008
- December, 2007
- November, 2007
- October, 2007
- September, 2007
- August, 2007
- July, 2007
- January, 2007
- November, 2006
- October, 2006
- July, 2006
- June, 2006
- May, 2006
- April, 2006
- March, 2006
- January, 2005
- December, 2004
|
Friday, February 3, 2012
ほこたて
昨日から気になっているんだけど、この2つのNatureとCellの論文ってどうなんでしょう？
矛盾してるよね？
Nature
Maternal and paternal genomes contribute equally to the transcriptome of early plant embryos
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v482/n7383/abs/nature10756.html
Cell
Maternal Epigenetic Pathways Control Parental Contributions to Arabidopsis Early Embryogenesis
http://www.cell.com/abstract/S0092-8674(11)00433-8
Natureで、「Cellの論文は、parent-of-origin effectsとかseed coatのコンタミとかが考えられるよね」と可能性を列挙してあるけど、説得力ないなぁー。
どなたか詳しい方、教えてください。
（専門の方が、ここを覗きにきてくださっていたはずww）
|
|
